Everyone Forever

The High Cost of Crashes

2011-11-24T21:55:00.001-08:00

In addition to the terrible toll that motor vehicle collisions have on people, they also incur a huge economic cost, assuming it is even acceptable to place a dollar amount on people’s lives.

From Analysis and Estimation of the Social Cost of Motor Vehicle Collisions in Ontario by Transport Canada:

The 613,000 motor vehicle collisions occurring in Canadian jurisdictions in 2004 resulted in social costs of $63 billion. By type of collision, social costs were $39 billion (62%), $20 billion (32%), and $3 billion (5%) for fatal, injury and PDO collisions respectively.

Transport Canada estimates these societal cost of motor vehicle crashes amount to 1.5% of GDP in Canada. By comparison, congestion costs only amount to between 0.5% to 0.7% of GDP. However, as around 20% of congestion and thus congestion cost is due to collisions, the lower estimate of less than 0.5% of GDP seems reasonable.

Making Zero Fatalities the Safety Goal
As bad as the costs of crashes are in Canada, they are even worse in the States where the costs average for crashes is around $1,500 per person per year verses under $500 for congestion. In fact, the AAA , in their report Crashes vs. Congestion – What’s the Cost to Society?, is recommending that “Achieving zero [traffic] fatalities should be the national safety goal.

Obviously with around 40,000 fatalities a year in the States, that is going to be a real challenge. However, for individual cities and towns, where fatalities number in the tens per year, this is a very realistic and worthwhile goal to strive for.

A Key Economic Advantage
The loss of a key person is devastating for organizations of all sizes. Creating a safe city and marketing that advantage could attract businesses helping to create jobs and boost the economy. Reducing crashes will also reduce health care, policing and other government costs leading to lower taxes or higher levels of government services.

Nov. 19 - Help Cycling and the Environment Win Big

2011-11-16T12:55:00.000-08:00

Please encourage at least 10 of your friends, family and coworkers to vote for Mayor Robertson, Vision Vancouver and COPE on November 19. Phone them, text them, email them, buy them brunch or dinner or for that special friend, invite them on a vote date. Nothing says love like voting for a better future. More info on voting at the bottom of this message. Even if you can't vote in Vancouver, you can still encourage others to vote and vote for candidates who support cycling in your community.

Here is a handy guide to the Vision and COPE candidates that you can print out:
https://votevision.ca/sites/all/files/Vision_Cope_Ballot_for_print.pdf

A Critical Election for the Future

This is more than just a critical election for the future of Vancouver. With all the media attention cycling has received, the eyes of the world will be on Vancouver. A landslide for those who strongly support the environment and cycling will send a powerful message to other city's where politicians are considering putting in bike lanes and other green measures. Just squeaking by is not good enough. With 62% of Vancouver residents including 76% from 18-34 years old supporting bike lanes, we have the numbers behind us but that does not matter if they don't vote.

What Bike Lanes Mean to You

Please feel free to copy any of this message you what. However, please consider making your own personal message. For Burrard Bridge, many of you wrote to council with powerful accounts of what better bicycle facilities meant for you, your family, your friends and community. These personal messages made a real difference. Please let the people you know the difference the separated bike lanes have made in your life and what a network of these around the city would mean for you and the people you care about.

The Greenest City

Vision Vancouver and COPE councilors and Mayor Robertson approved the Greenest City Action Plan to transform Vancouver into the world's Greenest City by 2020. Improved cycling, walking and transit are critical components of that plan.

Cycling for All

For me, cycling downtown is now an enjoyable safe experience, not an extreme sport. What most encouraging is seeing people cycle downtown with their children. A few Sundays ago, I saw a girl around five surrounded by three adults cycling happily along Hornby. A few days later, I witnesses a family of four with one child on a trail-a-bike and one cycling on their own turning from the sidewalk on Main onto the Dunsmuir Viaduct. I look forward to the day when there is a separated bike lane along Main so they aren't forced to cycle on the sidewalk.

People's Safety Must be the Priority

Politicians who place people's safety above traffic flow need to be rewarded by reelecting them. Perhaps the best example of this is the 30 km/h speed limit along Hastings in response to numerous pedestrian deaths. Even though it has been proven that at speeds above 30 km/h crashes are far more likely to be deadly for pedestrians and cyclists, a vocal minority, including the NPA opposed this. Fortunately, like in the separated bike lanes, Vision and COPE councillors supported safer speed limits.

Candidates with Bad Bicycle Ideas

The NPA does not support the Greenest City Action Plan nor does it support safe separated bike lanes. In fact, the NPA's Anton is promising a moratorium on these safe bike lanes. Their other candidates are not any better. Ken Carko of the NPA, has proposed "seasonal bike lanes" removing the protection for cyclists in the dark and rainy times of year when they are needed most. His running mate, Sean Bickerton, is promising to licence cyclists, an idea that has proved expensive, impractical and ineffective in every city that has tried it. Not to be outdone, the Green Party's Adrienne Carr piped up with bike-free streets. She quickly back-pedalled into an equally bad idea of banning bikes from curbside bus lanes forcing cyclists to "share" the middle lanes with traffic or more likely, just force them onto the sidewalks. Not great or safe result for pedestrians or cyclists. The obvious solution would have been separated bike lanes but Carr has not yet committed to that.

We can't afford another Rob Ford

While unlikely, unless we are can't get the majority of people in Vancouver who support the environment to vote, a loss by Mayor Robertson, Vision and COPE would send a chilling message to politicians around Canada and North America. Other mayors would likely think twice before taking the bold actions needed to solve our many problems including climate change and energy and resource depletion.

We must ensure that this does not happen.

Voting Information

City of Vancouver Election Information including how and where to vote:

http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/elections/2011election/

Vision Vancouver

https://votevision.ca/

COPE

http://cope.bc.ca/

Volunteering

Please consider also helping Vision and COPE get the vote out!

http://votevision.ca/volunteer-events-calendar

http://cope.bc.ca/get-involved/volunteer/

Vision Vancouver Vision Vancouver needs cyclists to deliver poll-cards all day Thursday + Friday. If you can help out contact, brenton.walters@votevision.ca or 604.568.6913 ext 108.

Other Information

COPE Candidates to Put Bike and Pedestrian Safety First

http://cope.bc.ca/2011/10/20/cope-candidates-to-put-bike-and-pedestrian-safety-first/

Vision Vancouver's Environmental and Cycling Record and Platform

http://votevision.ca/issue/greenest-city

Gordon Price's take on cycling "policies" put forward by candidates:

http://pricetags.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/political-notes-2-hornby-cycle-track-update-15/

BCCC Information on Candidates and Cycling in Communities Around BC
http://bccyclingcoalition.blogspot.com/2011/11/vote-for-cycling-on-november-19.html

Out of Tune - Industry Admits the Future of the Auto is not Green

2010-11-08T14:07:00.000-08:00

Well, now it is really obvious, on the off-chance it was not obvious before.

All the ads with furry critters fawning in the forest over SUVs.
All the breathless claims that the electric car is finally here.
All the ads showing cars crumbling back to the earth leaving not a trace.
All pure propaganda.

While they may have be singing a green tune in New York in May, now, their actions and their wallets, or in GM's case, our wallets, are speaking louder than words. Even after being wiped out by high oil prices and an almost depression, only to be saved by taxpayers, the Wall Street Journal reports that Mileage Rules Prompt Backlash while Fox News states that Auto makers fight Obama's fuel standards.

Auto makers and car dealers, emboldened by rising profits and a more business-friendly Congress, say they will fight the Obama administration's proposal to boost average new-car fuel economy to as much as 62 miles a gallon by 2025.

Clearly, they would not be doing this if they had any faith that people would be buying electric vehicles in the next couple of decades. Clearly, they don't and people won't. As was the case for the last 40 years, when the electric car was continually "just around the corner", with the breakthrough in battery technology just months away, like lite and low-tar cigarettes, the electric car is simply a propaganda tool to convince the public that there is a fabulous future for the automobile age once fossil fuels are going, going, gone.

The Windsor Star on December 15, 1967 reported AMC out front electrically.

...indications are good that vehicles like those under serious consideration by a growing number of companies could be available in five years or sooner. ...AMC group vice-president in charge of engineering, told us that there are no major hurdles to jump to bring it to reality-firming up the final design and time-consuming proving and testing are all that remains to be done. It's that simple, he said.

Unbelievably, further details from The Owosso Argus-Press December 12, 1967 seem identically to the claims being made today by the industry. As today, they are claiming lithium batteries are the major breakthrough.

Dr. Leslie K. Gulton said. "for the first time in half a century, the gasoline burning automobile is about the share the road with an electrically powered car whose performance needs no apologies.

Well, 43 years later, this car is still not here nor is AMC for that matter. It is that simple. I guess we should all be happy that the industry is so committed to the environment it seems to be recycling old AMC PR spin pretty much verbatim except for the part about taking it to the heliport. I guess if it still works, why bother changing it. Fool us once, shame on them, fool us over and over again every five years, well...

Speaking of which, they were at it again in March 1974. The Beaver County Times reported Electric Car Ready by June.

Improvements in the already patented battery will estend [sic] the range to 350 miles in two years. A prototype 18 months down the road includes a battery pack that could be charged in 5 minutes...

Paul Agarwa, head of General Motors, electrical-vehicle research and development, says that by the year 2000 almost all cars will be electric in and around cities....

Skipping forward to today, it looks like the PR departments still spinning the same old lines. Fortunately, we can get a better idea of what the industry really thinks the future holds from their high paid lobbyists. The industry lobby group, the Auto Alliance, knows that electric vehicles will not be economically viable especially in an economy with stagnant wages.

"If the economics for high fuel-economy vehicles is so overwhelming, why do so few consumers today choose to buy high fuel-economy vehicles?" the letter asks.

The alliance added that at the very least, the price of a car would increase $4,448 under the 62-mpg rule.

This is not surprising as the battery packs of even tiny electric cars like the Nissan Leaf cost around $18,000. Imagine what the battery for huge SUV's the industry is convinced Americans love that are two to three times the weight of the Leaf would cost. For a family with two of the these beasts, the batteries could cost more than their house in the post bubble market. While "economies of scale" could reduce this cost, high demand could also increase the cost of the resources required to make the batteries.

Even worse, GM, the so called Government Motors, that is owned by the US, Canadian and Ontario governments is now spending dollars that it would not have if it were not for taxpayer's support.

GM, which had stopped making campaign contributions as it underwent its taxpayer-funded bankruptcy restructuring, recently resumed such spending, giving thousands of dollars to lawmakers' campaigns in the midterm election. GM has said it is exercising its right to support lawmakers who will push policies that help the industry.

Looks like the industry created the best congress money could buy.

Even worser, in spite of ads bragging about how safe their products are, they are concerned far more concerned with profits than the safety of their customers or innocent victims of their products.

Auto makers lobbied heavily against a bill to mandate new safety technologies and increased government oversight, which was proposed in response to the uproar over Toyota Motor Corp.'s sudden acceleration recalls. That legislation now appears all but dead.

Unfortunately, not only is the legislation dead but tragically, the million people who are killed by motor vehicles each and every year will be as well.

So, it is time to face the reality that the age of the automobile is over. It is merely a symptom of cheap oil. With the auto industry fighting mileage standards and unwilling or unable to bring fuel efficient cars to bring anywhere enough electric and fuel efficient cars to market in the next couple of decades, lets stop wasting limited taxpayer's dollars on roads and begin the transition to real sustainable transportation including high speed rail, rapid transit, cycling and walking.

Road Kill vs. Oil Spill - Oil in Cars More Deadly to Birds than Oil Dumped in Gulf

2010-07-30T13:57:00.000-07:00

The pictures of the oiled pelicans are heartbreaking. A real wake up call to eliminate our addition to oil. It is tragic that it takes such a catastrophe to wake us up to the folly of overuse of oil.

As bad as the spill is on birds, with over 3100 and counting being killed, the oil that makes it way to the gas tanks of America's automobiles is much more dangerous to birds. Between 50 million and 100 million are killed on the nation's roads every year. The 4 million or so barrels of oil amounts to around 20% of the 20 million barrels required to power motor vehicles daily. With the daily bird kill being between 137,000 and 274,000, this 4 million barrels would have killed 27,000 and 55,000 if it had been used to power automobiles.

If you a bird, each and everyday there is the equivalent of between 8 and 17 Gulf Oil Disasters on the roads of America or between 3,200 and 6,400 every year. Squawk!

Of course, seabirds like pelicans will appreciate that the oil in cars is unlikely to be as deadly to them as some of their other feathered friends. Small consolation.

In no way am I saying that oil should be dumped in water to save birds on America's highways and byways. Instead, it would be much better to leave this valuable but deadly resource locked away safely in the ground saving it for future generations to make wiser use of it than driving several thousands pounds of metal and plastic to the gym to ride a stationary bike or run on a treadmill.

The birds will thank us.

Transit is Fun

2010-03-01T14:02:00.000-08:00

Who would have thought. Transit has the rep of being cost effective, practical, green and healthy. Now, thanks to the Olympics, it is time to add fun to the growing list of benefits of public transit. This is perhaps one of the least expected results from the Olympics. I did expect that the games would transform how we get around in Vancouver, but I thought the impact would be more incremental than obviously transformational.

I must admit that I enjoyed getting around the city fast on my bicycle, avoiding the line-ups and crowds. Some drivers also figured out that driving was quicker than expected because pretty much everyone was packed onto rails, buses and boats. However, it slowly dawned on me, that sharing the ride with hundreds of thousands of strangers was becoming a great part of the Olympic experience. Line-up became temporary communities. People broke out into spontaneous choruses of Oh Canada on SkyTrain cars. Transit not only facilitated the party by moving millions of people around, it became part of the party. Getting around by a car or on a bike, while quick, was not so fun anymore. Perhaps this is why many more people than expected were using transit.

Clearly, the success of the Canada Line became a big part of the buzz. Contrast this with Sea to Sky Highway. While it is dutifully mentioned as a legacy of the games, people's experience on the highway was not part of the buzz to say the least. The only comment I saw was how, in spite of the great scenery, people seemed to be likely to sleep through the ride. In fact, Alberta scored big by chartering the train to Whistler. Seems like the VIPs that Alberta wanted face time with, preferred a relaxing train ride to Whistler over being chauffeured up. So rail seems to offer a great experience for everyone. Cost to BC taxpayers of upgrading the Highway - $8 billion. Cost of Alberta renting the train - $6 million. Alberta scores great business connections - Priceless.

In spite of the trillions of dollars being spent on marketing individual transportation, as very social beings, it is clear that we like to be around lots of other people while we get around, especially if everyone is having a great time. Now, it helps that during the Olympics, people were more likely to be traveling with friends and family than during the daily commute. The take away, perhaps, is to focus much more effort on marketing transit for social and entertainment trips in the evenings and weekends, when there is plenty of capacity.

The other takeaway is, that in spite of the marketing hype, driving in the city is just not that much fun anymore. It is becoming a more and more miserable experience. Congestion on roads is no fun. Congestion in trains and transit stations is fun. Congestion on roads creates angry, isolated people. Congestion in trains and transit stations can lead to happy people talking to former strangers.

The Future of Flying and Driving are Really Shakey

2009-06-03T14:33:00.000-07:00

Now that high speed fever has finally hit Vancouver, people somehow seem really surprised that there are not already plans and funding in place for it. Some are taking the old plans developed by Washington State during the peak of cheap oil and indifference from Canada as set in stone and not subject to revision even in face of the new found commitment of the US Federal Government to fund and champion high speed rail.

News reports quote staff from Washington that not surprisingly state the current policy, as staff is supposed to do until they receive new direction from the politicians. The reports then make the huge leap and come to the conclusion that high speed rail will never happen, that at best, it is on "really shaky ground". Well, it was on really shaky ground in the states before the last election. Since when does having currently policies mean policies won't change?

High speed rail is proven technology used by millions of people in countries around the world. It is the only form of long-distance transportation that does not face a shakey, uncertain future. The airline industry is not profitable, has no proven alternative to oil, and is becoming an increasingly miserable experience. Gas prices are certain to rise and the world's oil supply will run out sooner or later, leading to the end of gas powered automobiles. in a world where wages where stagnent even before the recession, it is uncertain that electric cars will ever be an affordable alternative even if technical and practive hurdles can be overcome.

Even if by some miricle the problems facing flying and driving can be overcome, high speed rail is still a faster, more affordable, greener and more comfortable form of transportation for trips between 100 and 500 km. Compared to the tens of billions of dollars we collectively spend per year on flying and driving, the cost of high speed rail is a relative bargin. By not building high speed rail, we risk our economic future.

change.gov:The Main Train Drains the Planes in Spain

2009-01-16T22:41:00.000-08:00

Seems like the Spanish are jumping off planes and onto trains in record numbers, leading to the unfortunate rhyming of headlines all around the Net. The planes in Spain carried 20 percent fewer fed up victims last year.

According to Wired Autopia, "Airlines carried 72 percent of the 4.8 million long-distance travelers who opted to go by rail or air in 2007. That fell to 60 percent last year". Joseph Valls, a professor at the ESADE business school in Barcelona told The Guardian "The numbers will be equal in two years." This is really "Change We Can Believe In" as it is actually happening.

Again from Wired, "Alberto Garcia of the Spanish Railways Foundation estimates AVE trains use 19 percent less energy than conventional trains and generate one-sixth the carbon emissions of a plane."

By 2020, Spain plans on building 10,000 more km of high-speed rail. Over here, at least California is planning on building some, if it doesn't go totally bankrupt and is repossessed by Mexico first. Or would that be Spain. Not sure. Anyway, it is time the US and Canada get cracking and stop wasting money on roads and make massive investments in high speed rail and rapid transit.

The so called "Green Stimulus" plan of Obama is really disappointing. It calls for $30 billion for roads and only $10 billion for transit and rail. In fact, the amount for high speed rail is only $1.5 billion while there is $2 billion for batteries. That doesn't really seem like much of a change at all.

Fortunately, the people are a step or two ahead. They have forgotten all about electric cars which now seem oh so mid 2008. Back when oil prices were high and people still could afford expensive cars by taking out second or third zero percent mortgages on their McMansions. Now $40,000 cars that you have to plug-in don't seem like such a great idea.

Electric cars are the "solution" for everyone else. The people that people believe will never get out of their cars. Yet, when asked what they want, people ask for better transportation, not a electric band aid that will not make getting around any more convenient, faster or more enjoyable. It is problem solving instead of looking for better solutions and new opportunities. If that thinking had prevailed one hundred years ago, we would be riding around on horses with diapers.

It is not electric cars or more roads that people really want, it is high speed rail and rapid transit. Fortunately the people sending this message out clear and strong at Obama's site, change.gov. The top 20 or so ideas contain five or six that are related to rail and transit. Electric cars, not so much.

Let the soon to be Prez know that you want high speed rail and rapid transit at change.gov

It is the forth most popular idea. Your vote can help make it the top idea.

While you are at it, support my Billions for Bicycles idea which doesn't seem to be as popular. At least it faired better than Put Warning Labels on Cars and Ban Irresponsible Auto Advertising, which seem to be dropping in popularity faster than the stocks of the small three automakers.

Last of all, the reason why the world should be happy I didn't become a poet or more likely, the reason why I could not become one. Enjoy?

After the day began on the plain main train through plains of grain, to my bane, the insane rain in Spain sustained, drained my brain again, dry hopes in vain, restrained, waned, feigned. What a inane pain to gain raising cain, last obtained on stained lanes of Danes.

Provide Solutions and Avoid Gas Tax Pains and Carbon Tax Attacks

2008-12-30T16:34:00.000-08:00

It all sounds so nice and green and fair. A revenue neutral carbon tax for British Columbia, the Best Place on Earth. The greens loved it. The first government in North America to give carbon taxing a shot. If it worked here, it would spread like wildfire across North America.

Well, the organic manure hit the windmill. It is fair to say that it was not a popular move. In a move that still seems rather surreal, the left leaning New Democratic Party borrowed a page from the neo-cons and starting an “Axe the Tax” campaign. The bad timing of the summer’s high gas prices certainly didn’t help. People were mad and looking for fight.

Now, with falling oil prices, there is concern that people will quickly return to their SUV lovin’ ways. Both for environmental, security and economic reasons, there is talk about gas or carbon taxes to discourage overuse of the precious black gold.

In going forward with such politically tricky ideas, it is important to learn from the BC experience. It would be easy enough to draw the conclusion that people just are not willing to except such taxes. This would be a mistake. The problem is not with the concept of a carbon tax, it is how it was implemented that caused the pain.

First of all, while it may have seemed like a good idea at the time, making the tax revenue neutral proved to be a bad idea. The anti-tax crowd, likely the ones the government was trying to bring onboard with revenue neutrality just simply does not like taxes, especially new ones, especially ones that they perceive as social engineering. On top of that, many just don’t trust government. They fully expect the money to be used for something and thus were not convinced.

People want solutions. If they feel they have no options to avoid paying the tax, they will feel like they are being unfairly targeted for actions they have little control over. They will fell like they are being punished for driving and they feel they have no alternatives, they will get mad.

Instead of returning the money from the carbon tax, a better idea would be to use it to fund transit improvements and other public measures that can help people reduce their carbon emissions. Five billion in transit improvements will get peoples attention. Construction companies, consultants and unions will be onboard. Drivers will feel that they have an option or at least will think that other drivers with leaving them with more space on the road. People waiting in the cold while packed trains and buses pass them by will certainly be excited about increased transit funding.

Using funding from a tax to improve public transit creates a lot of big winners who will provide the public support needed for the tax to be successful. A revenue neutral tax will create a lot of small winners who, given the small amount they receive, will not really care much one way or the other.

People don’t mind pay more taxes if they know the money will be used for something they want. If the last election was any indication, people clearly want money to be spent on rail and rapid transit. Voters in Seattle, Los Angles and Honolulu approved tens of billions of dollars in tax increases for rapid transit. California approved ten billion dollars for high-speed rail.

No one really gets that excited about receiving a hundred dollars in the mail. It is no big deal these days. Pretty much everyone will pay some of that in carbon tax so really no one really benefits that much.

Congestion charging has been a success in London because transit improvements where on the ground when the charges came into effect. Pricing without improvements is rather cruel. Without alternatives, it is just another tax that is unlikely to change people’s behavior.

Pooling our resources to create a better transportation system is a far more compelling idea than giving everybody a hundred bucks and hoping against all hope they can use this small amount of money to somehow provide themselves with a greener transportation solution.

Ironically, the province did announce a transit plan before the carbon tax was implemented. Which is all fine and good. Only problem is that they didn’t have a plan to fund it. Without such a plan, it is hard for people to take the plan that seriously especially when they are staring a carbon tax in the face. Only now is the province looking at revenue sources to fund the transit improvements. Up on the list are bright ideas like a cell phone tax (I don’t get it either) and of course gas taxes, congestion charges and road pricing.

So when governments are considering carbon taxes, road pricing and other similar measures, here are a few suggestions:

Create many big winners
Provide people with solutions so they have an option to avoid paying
Clearly tie the tax or charge to the solutions
Announce the solutions and the tax or charge at the same time
Have solutions on the ground when the tax or charge starts
As the solutions improve, increase the tax or charge

Good Luck!

Billions for Bikes Beats Band-aid Bailouts

2008-12-21T13:23:00.000-08:00

Shockingly enough, this is my first post dedicated to bicycles. I was rather fixated on high-speed rail for a while. Now that the people in my home state have voted to spend $10 billion on high-speed rail and there is talk of systems all over North America, it is time to focus on pedal power.

In a world shaken to the core by climate change, volatile fuel prices, rising obesity rates and a collapsing economy, there has never been a better time for cycling. What is possible will only be limited by our vision and execution.

Green stimulus is all the rage. People realize that this is an opportunity to transform our cities and our economy. We need to create a world where people can live great lives while using much less energy and resources. This, really is our only option.

Politicians are looking for shovel ready projects where construction can start as soon as possible. Bicycle paths and bridges are idea. Compared to other types of projects, they are simpler and have less impact on the environment and the community. Transit and rail projects are complicated and can take years to plan. Not to argue against transit and rail, we need both. It is just that cycling projects can be done now while the economy is still in the tank. This will provide people with both jobs and affordable transportation speeding the recovery.

Be sure to push for high-quality cycling facilities that people want and will use. This tends to be paths and cycle tracks, like in Amsterdam and Copenhagen that are separated from cars. There is little evidence that even bike lanes are effective at encouraging more people to cycle. By pushing for want people actually want, you will find that politicians are likely to be more receptive in spite or even because of the additional cost.

Don't be afraid to dream big. Politicians just aren't interested in small projects that no one will even notice. Don't forget, the goal is economic stimulus. That means big bucks. These people are used to dealing with large numbers. Don't waste their time or yours with small projects.

Unlike the automobile industry, the bicycle industry is doing just fine thank you. Sales are at record levels. Unfortunately, unlike the automobile industry, the bicycle industry has not done a very good job of fighting for funding for facilities. If auto industry had done such a poor job, we would still be riding horses and well, bicycles. Fortunately, the bike industry is starting to support advocacy groups, but much more needs to be done.

So start phoning, writing, and meeting with your elected representatives. Join and volunteer for cycling advocacy groups. Form your own. Bring your friends, family and co-workers on board. Be relentless. Don't take no for an answer. Remember, the squeaky gets the green stimulus.

More info:

Third Wave Cycling Group - My consulting firm

British Columbia Cycling Coalition - British Columbia's Cycling Advocates

Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition

Bikes Belong - Sponsored by the U.S. bicycle industry with the goal of putting more people on bicycles more often

Thunderhead Alliance - The national coalition of state and local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy organizations

Sustrans - The UK's leading sustainable transport charity

Active Transportation for America - A Case for Increased Federal Investment in Bicycling and Walking

Certainty in an Uncertain World - The Case for Accelerated Investment in Cycling

Unfair Debate and Just Plain Invalid Arguments

2008-12-20T21:34:00.000-08:00

So now Bush has doomed the economy with the band aid bailout, I can stop madly posting on every comment section on the web. Not quite sure why I never got around to posting on that. I guess it was such a bad idea, I was not quite sure where to start.

Well, now on to the annoyance du jour. It is bad enough when environmentally sites do PR for automakers and advertise so called green cars. I guess it pays the bills. Might as well get some money from them while they still have any money to give.

What got to me today was an ad on grist that was not only plain wrong but also used just plain old faulty logic to draw people in. That did it. If there is one thing I can't stand is stuff that couldn't pass a first year philosophy course, which includes the majority of stuff posted on the web these days. Half the world's problems could be solved if people would just take Philosophy 112 or whatever number it was.

Anyway, the offending ad displays a nice beach with a sunset mentions something about drilling for oil and proceeds to proclaim "overpopulation is an environmental problem". Fair enough, their are six billion or so of us. That is a lot, I'll admit. The button said "join the debate". The site was fairdebate.org. Suspecting that the only reason someone would call their site fairdebate would be to try and hide the fact that the debate was anything but fair, I couldn't resist clicking the button.

Fair, turns out to not describe the quality of the debate but the rather cute acronym for the Federation for American Immigration Reform. Fair enough. What is not fair is the quick bait and switch they pull. Turns out they don't seem to care about global population, just US population. And not just any old US population, merely those who happen to be a little newer newcomers than the rest of us newcomers. The religious conservatives having 17 and counting children don't seem to be on their radar yet in spite of their hit show on TLC.

True, more people in the US will have an impact on the American environment but in a world of global warming, the key word is global. It doesn't really matter if someone is in the good old US of A or in Timbuktu, the impact is the same, isn't it. Well, actually not. The people of the US are just about the hoggest of resource and energy hogs. Sure, when someone comes to the country to live what is rapidly becoming the American nightmare, they are likely to "When in Rome, do as the Romans do".

And the prize for bucking personal responsibility goes to FAIR. They won it fair and square. A small suggestion. How about cutting down on your own consumption before building the fence. This would have the added benefit of not sending hundreds of billions of dollars overseas for oil to people who don't like you very much. Save the economy and the environment at the same time. Sounds like a good deal. You might what to some some for the kids as well. They might really appreciate that when they grow up.

I suspect though, that it may not be the environment they are really concerned about. It is more about being scared of losing their so call high standard of living which they seem to be doing a fine job of losing on their own. Who would have thought that it would be their own captains of capitalism that would steer the ship into the rocks. They were too busy worrying about more people climbing on board to notice.

Back to population. The key is ensuring women have access to education, economic opportunity and are free to make choices regarding their lives. These are basic rights that have the added benefit of solving the "population crisis". Europe is proof of this. So is my dating life. I tend to be attracted to bright women. Of the dozens I have dated, I only know of two who have had children.

So if you are worried about the impact of population on the environment, you know what to fight for. Women's rights and lower consumption of resources and energy. If you are worried about immigration, stop that. If you are still having trouble, stop listening to Lou Dobbs. If you can't, then at least stop using the environment as an excuse. It is elitist at best to think that you have more rights to resources and to pollute than other people.

Yikes, a google later and it is much worse than I thought, my spidy sense was right:

http://www.adl.org/civil_rights/is_fair_unfair.pdf

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846

The Future Has not Happened Yet

2008-11-05T16:01:00.000-08:00

After several hours of pouring over the news of Obama’s historic victory with tears of joy in my eyes, it is time to reflect on what happened and the hard work ahead. The change has just begun.

I witnessed the election of the first African American President from a smoke-free bar in Vancouver. A mere forty years ago, I’m not sure which would have seemed more improbable.

When Vancouver first tried to ban smoking in bars and restaurants, the industry was up in arms, predicting economic disaster and the end of civilization as we know it. They showed up on mass at public meetings and lobbied intensely. Fortunately civic leaders stuck to their guns. Their fears failed to materialize. They were forced to improve their food because people can now taste it. If anything, smoke-free bars are now attracting people that used avoid smoky pits.

Early this year, when the city proposed banning smoking from even out door patios, nobody said a peep. I guess they realized, that with only 13% of the population smoking, it is no big deal.

As big a battle as it has been to reduce the scourge of tobacco, it pales in comparison to the oppression and huge challenges African Americans have overcome. A struggle that threatened to tear the nation apart. Many brave people have risked their lives to make yesterday possible. Many have died.

In both cases, it would have been easier for many to simply accept that the future would be the same as the past. But people of courage and vision knew the future will be different if they took a stand for what is right. They knew that change is not only possible, it is inevitable if we believe and fight for it. That change is all we have. That change is the hope of a better world, in the face of seems impossible. They knew from the bottom of their heart, without knowing how or when, that the future had not happened yet.

Our ability to anticipate events is perhaps one of our greatest strengths. It saves us from floods, earthquakes and famine. It is also our greatest obstacles to a better world. The future is a wild horse that can’t be tamed. At best, we do our best to hang on and hope for the best. While anticipation is a gift, our ability to chance is what gives us the wings to soar above what many were sure that was all that was possible.

We may never create a perfect world but it is only through the striving for that which we are sure is not possible that we approach our potential.

While taken time to celebrate our victories, we must chart our course forward to overcome the many challenges facing the world today.

Eclipsed, and rightly so, by Obama’s accomplishment, yesterday also witnessed the start of another chapter in the history of change. This time, it is change for the sake of the planet. \The people of California, in spite or perhaps because of the financial crisis, approved $10 billion dollars to start building high-speed rail from San Diego to Sacramento. The state that road to greatness of endless freeways, now is starting to turn its back on the automobile. This is a bold step that, in the next forty years will transform California and indeed the whole country.

For those that think the only path forward is greener fuels and vehicles, Californian’s rejected propositions for alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy bonds; and renewable energy generation.

For those too busy predicting the future to invent it.

For those too absorbed in small drama to notice people’s passion for chance, open your eyes.

For those ruled by the truisms “People love their cars” and “You’ll never get people out of their cars.”, I stood as a witness of the election of an African American president in a smoke free bar.

Yes We Did, Yes We Can and Yes We Will

The future has not happened yet.

The Ability to Lead

2008-10-31T22:02:00.000-07:00

In spite of my near addition to election coverage, this is the first time I’ve chimed up on the race. With all that has been written and rewritten in the last two years, I am not sure what I can really add that hasn’t been said by people who can say it far better than I can but here goes.

It has certainly been a race that has evoked passionate debate. However, I do believe there is a critical difference between the candidates that pretty much everyone can agree on. The difference certainly isn’t policy. People will likely never agree on what is the best policy. Nor should we. Healthy debate is good. The future has not happened yet, so there is really there is no way of being sure what works and doesn’t work.

It is perhaps execution that is more important that the policy anyway. Whether you agree with the policies of President Bush or not, it is much easier to agree that current administration’s execution has been truly awful. From the war to the economy, the lack of competence has been truly staggering. And don’t forget, George Bush by most accounts was a fine governor of Texas, one of the largest states in the nation, so clearly “executive experience” doesn’t count for much.

Speaking of experience, understand that any talk about experience in the campaign was never about determining if someone has the experience to be President. Experience was just another talking point in a tactic in the strategy to gain an advantage over the opponent to win the keys to the big White House.

The challenge is to determine if someone will do a great job of something they have never done before. This is especially a challenge in a presidential campaign as there are really no other jobs that compare. One has to look at other endeavors that people have taken on and look at the way they have taken them on to determine, if indeed a candidate has the ability to be a good over even great president.

Fortunately, for the last two years, we have been witnessing such an endeavor, this historic election campaign. A successful campaign both involves choosing exceptional people for the job at hand and leading these people in an effective manner. As luck would have it, these two abilities are perhaps the most important for a president as well. You might be able to get away with appointing your buddies to run a state, but clearly, this does not work well when running a large countrys.

While disagreeing on just about everything else, pundits on both sides have agreed that Senator Obama has run one of the best campaigns ever. A well managed, disciplined and excellently lead campaign. Many say even a brilliant campaign. He has raised more money than another other candidate in history from a record number of donors taking full advantage of the Internet. A campaign that started from nothing a mere two years ago and outflanked the Clinton’s, the most powerful political machine in the country. No small feat. For the first time in years, a Democrat has a better ground game, mobilizing hundreds of thousands of people. Looks like being a community organizer really paid off.

Now to Senator McCain. With an unpopular Republican president and a crumbling economy, it is not apparent that even a flawless campaign would have done the trick. What is apparent that his train wreck of a campaign will most likely not. Remember way back to the primaries, where he planned a $150 million effort complete with a $10,000 a day bus. Well, the fundraising came up way short and he was forced to ditch the bus, his campaign staff and fly coach to New Hampshire. This does not bode well for someone hoping to be President in economically challenging times. He was meet by an aid at the airport. Traveling around the state to countless town hall meetings, he rebuilt his campaign and the rest is history. Certainly an inspiring comeback story, but, since he seems to be more adept at working by him self rather than leading a huge team. This is fine for a maverick Senator but will not work at all well for a president.

In spite of a military background, where discipline is not just a nice to have, it can be a matter of life and death; the McCain campaign has been sloppy. They have had trouble sticking to message. Staff spent $150,000 on clothes for Gov. Palin, not even thinking how off the hockey mom Joe Six Pack message that was. Even worse, they let the candidate take the fall. Yikes. Campaign staff has been complaining about Gov. Palin to the media. Again, this is not useful and speaks to a lack of discipline and leadership in the campaign. Such leaks are bad for a campaign. Just think how bad they could be for the country in a time of crisis.

The drama of the McCain campaign often draws more media attention than the message. We have enough problems in this world. While McCain’s drama makes good television, we really don’t need a president that seems to need to manufacture such distractions.

It almost is a shame that Senator Obama is a great inspiring speaker. This is what people first notice. Some don’t look beyond, dismissing him as an “empty suit”. Once you get beyond the soaring rhetoric, you will discover a lot more than empty. He has the ability to be a great president. He is focused, disciplined and is a very effective leader who surrounds himself with bright and capable people.

Even if you believe he is a socialist (I don’t), I argue that it is better to have someone who can successfully execute such an agenda as president rather than someone who will continue to bungle along with the free market. So what if he “pals around” with the “wrong people”. If you do your homework, he also “pals around” with the “right people” as well. McCain has some shady characters in his past as well. Anyway, courting such a diversity of opinions is a sign of a great leader.

Sen. Obama has lead a masterful campaign that has overwhelmed the Clinton machine and McCain, who has been running for president for the last decade.

His execution has been close to flawless. He is determined and relentless.

This is a guy you want on your side. This is the guy we need to lead the country.

And the Prize for Truth in Advertising Goes To...

2008-10-24T19:24:00.000-07:00

British Airways

I'm quiet literally stunned. There I was getting my daily fix of US election coverage. Before I could flip channels during a break in analysis of the analysts, there it was, British Airways hauntingly beautiful advert showing fish, dolphins, seals and assorted other sea creatures happily swimming around their brand spanking new Terminal Five. They were even nice enough to make the ad match the colour scheme of this site. Thanks BA, I think.

Given that Heathrow and especially the proposed third runway has been the target of passionate global warming protests, it is hard to even fathom the possibly that they would spend millions of dollars producing and airing a commercial that shows Terminal Five underwater and occupied by our finned friends, yet there it was.

As I’ve mentioned before, I found Terminal Five, terminally dull with its acres of white and grey. Must admit, it does look much better as an aquarium. Have to give them credit for planning for the future. The future they are trying so very hard to create with their schemes of ever-increasing air travel. They do have their work cut out for them. It will take a lot of Air Miles for ocean levels to top Heathrow. Fortunately, as I pointed out in my last post, even the Conservatives have come out against the third runway. There is plenty of time to stop them from flooding themselves.

So, for the guts to show the results of their business, their prize of course, is a gold statue Governor Palin in a Valentino jacket. By the looks of it, they have the same PR firm. One specializing in being way off message. Way, way, way, off the deep end.

Congratulations BA, you’ve earned it!

The Only Way to Swim

No Third Runway Action Group
http://www.notrag.org/

Green Conservatives and Air France Rail

2008-10-16T13:51:00.000-07:00

The seeming contradictions are piling up as fast as the stock market is falling. The world is changing rapidly around us yet we seem to be standing still, afraid to really do much of anything except watch the world pass us by.

Here in Canada, after suffering through the Election to Nowhere, we are stuck with a Conservative Party with really nothing left to conserve of the neo-conservatism that has grown rather old. Like it or not, there is no status quo any more.

The free market seems to have blown itself apart quite effectively. Seems like we have reached peak greed even before we hit peak oil. Making Hot Wheels is way more profitable than making full size automobiles. Yet here we stand clinging our McMansions, cars and big screen TV’s.

Over the pond, people, businesses and political parties are realizing and taking advantage of the new realities.

Air France, realizing the poor economics of air travel, will be operating high-speed rail by 2010.

The Conservatives in the UK, the party of Margaret Thatcher, actually seem to be committed to conservation and fighting climate change. Their logo is a big tree. They are aggressively opposing the third runway at Heathrow for environmental reasons. Instead, they are proposing a massive high-speed rail network throughout the country. Their plans are not being received that well by some members of the business community. This, of course, is to be expected, as entrenched interests always seem to fight change in spite of the potential upsides for the economy and the environment.

In an uncertain world, doing nothing is far riskier than change.

St. Pancras, the Champagne Bar and the Terminator

2008-10-15T13:55:00.000-07:00

It is just sooo civilized.
The newly restored St. Pancras Station is just magnificent. A great mixture of new and old. It brought high-speed rail to the heart of London making Paris just over two hours away. The highlight, is though, Europe’s longest champagne bar, lining the platform. Sipping blubbly and munching on a twenty pound plate of tiny but tasty snacks. Truly, traveling does not get any better than this.

Contrast St. Pancras to the fatally bland Terminal Five at Heathrow. I suspect that it caused a world-wide shortage of white paint. I would have hated to see what the old terminal was like. Just try lining the runway with any type of bar.

Train stations can be truly beautiful buildings at the heart of a city. Airports tend to be monstrosities sucking the soul out of cities and anyone unfortunate enough to be stuck in one for any amount of time at all.
So, St. Pancreas pretty much is the peak of civilization while the Terminator was trying to end it. Fortunately, Arnie as governator seems to be moving in the other direction. Not that I agree with him on everything, he has cut transit funding but, hell, I don’t agree with myself all the time. He was against the bullet train before he was for it. His priority a year ago seemed to be spending money on roads and not rail. I suspect high fuel prices changed all that.

He is now a supporter of the $10 billion high-speed rail initiative before California voters this November. He even broke his word not to sign any bills until the legislator approved a budget to approve the bill required to move the initiative forward. It is often great that politicians don’t follow through on everything they say.

The facebook group has over 30,000 members. I suspect it stands a good chance of passing due to high fuel prices and enthusiastic Obama supporters who are likely to support rail and transit. Still, it is a good idea to encourage your friends in the Golden State to vote for it. It would be great to experience
This vote is critical as it will mark the start of the movement in the States away from cars and planes which are destroying the economy, the environment and cities while providing people with an increasing miserable transportation experience.

San Francisco’s high speed rail station, Transbay Transit Center will be the first grand rail station built in North America in a century. Hopefully they figure out a snappier name though.

I am convinced that the best way forward is to provide people with great transportation experiences that are also environmentally friendly. Who knows, maybe the platform in Frisco will be lined with a champagne bar or even better, a brewpub serving a great porter.
Cheers!!

Going Backwards - Fast

2008-09-10T21:43:00.000-07:00

I was in Europe A couple of months ago. The main excuse was to check out bike sharing systems. I didn’t let that distract me from hopping on a train at any opportunity. The training started with the Eurostar, the high-speed rail from London to Paris.

It is good to get out of here every once and a while. A change in perspective can, well, change one’s perspective. In North America, surrounded by cars and planes, we think this is just how people get around. Even worse, we think that planes and cars represent the latest and greatest and the be all and end all in transportation. Well, that was the fifties. Now, the world is passing us by while we are dreaming of a past future that never will be. Passing us by so fast that we might as well be going backwards fast.

Just how fast, check out the video.

High-speed rail is fast and getting faster. This is not your father’s train. The latest ones are hitting 350 km per hour, almost 4 times what an automobile can go. And you don’t have to stop for chips or the can. As far as planes go, by the time you schlep out to the airport, suffer through insecurity line-ups and cram onto the plane, downtown to downtown rail is competitive for trips of up to five hours. And much more civilized.

We have wasted untold billions of silver and sweat in a transportation system that was a symptom of cheap, plentiful oil and steel. Now that neither are cheap, there is no longer a need to for the automobile industry. Hybrids are not a solution, they cost several thousands more up front at a time when wages are stagnant and prices are going up. Not a transportation solution for the masses, they do allow a few to ease their consciences. The reality is that congestion is making driving slower and slower. Rising costs of everything from steel to plastic to oil make the automobile a drag on the economy.

As planting hay and building stables would have been a folly a century ago, so is constructing highways, drilling for oil, building better batteries and hoping for hydrogen today. The folly of moving backwards fast.

Countries all over the world have been investing in high-speed rail for the last 30 years. Japan, France, Spain, all have great networks. China and India are coming on fast. Californians will be voting on high-speed rail. Probably even more important decision than the presidential race. Even Alberta, the oil capital of the world, is looking at a line between Calgary and Edmonton. As dealers of addictive substances have long known, it is better to stick to selling it than using it.

The progress in China is truly staggering. They building a 12,000 km high-speed railway network would connect all provincial capitals and major cities by 2020. The first inter-city high-speed link, between Tianjin and Beijing, opened August 1st, and more than 1.8 million passengers have ridden the 350-km/h electric trains. The 120km journey used to take 70 minutes but now takes only 30. They plan on having the speed up to 380kph in a couple of years. Don’t be distracted by the reports of their love affair with the car. Sure, they are using cars but they are also making massive investments in transit and rail. The really story is that they are leapfrogging us, if indeed, they ever were really behind.

Peering from the window of the Eurostar munching on what seems like my tenth croissant, the cars on the highways are moving backwards fast.

Climate Change is my Fault

2008-08-29T17:33:00.000-07:00

Ouch, it kinda hurts to say that.

I’m here. So is climate change. It is time for me to admit that ok, already, "Hi, my name is Richard and I am a global warmer". It’s the first step to recovery, don’t you know.

Not that it really matters whose fault it is, that is all water over the bridge. But going forward, what is important, is taking personal responsibility and commitment to finding solutions.

Looking back 20 years when I first became concerned, I first sat around watching depressing documentaries for a couple of year before deciding to get off my ass. I ditched the Accord. I took up cycling, walking and transit. Started some organizations, led protest rides, got a few metres for cyclists here and there.

I didn’t envision that 20 years later we would be in a worse mess than the day I started. Obviously, I failed miserable. Emissions are up 30% since the late eighties. Not that that matters going forward either. Playing blame game solitaire isn’t much fun but it sure beats passing the buck.

The wait until you do something before I will do anything game being played between the US, Canada, India and China is getting tiresome to stay the least. Although it is what made me pissed off enough to write this so I guess it is serving a useful purpose. Small consolation though.

Pointing ones finger at oil companies, republicans, the United States or China. Problem is, that really doesn’t solve anything except perhaps a lack of smugness. All I really can do is everything I can do. If others decide to do anything, that is great. That is their choice.

I admire people like Al Gore and David Suzuki for their commitment and tremendous. They have inspired millions to take action. They may well be successful in their efforts, but I not going to sit back and hope that they or anyone else will be successful. It is simply too large a risk to take.

So what does that look like? Well, you are looking at a start. Is a web site enough? Is bike sharing enough? I suspect not. Hey, but who knows. Not trying is the only way to ensure failure.

What I promise is that my efforts going forward my efforts and commitment will match the scale of the challenge.

The Relentless March of Inevitability

2008-08-26T19:20:00.000-07:00

2010 will mark a turning point. The people of Vancouver will be able to celebrate accomplishment of Olympic proportions. The calling of our age. A legacy ensuring hope for the future. It won’t be celabrated by the lighting of a flame, the raising of a flag or the playing of a national anthem. Instead it will be marked by the routine chime of a SkyTrain door, the chirp of a pedestrian button, the squeak of a chain or a simple “No thanks, I’ll take the bus.”

Late in the morning of Thursday February 11, 2010, a coffee mug will be placed in a holder and an engine will sputter to like marking the last time ever that the majority of the people of Vancouver will take a car to work. The next day, someone will make the choice to walk, cycle, or take transit thus culminating the relentless march of inevitability that began with the defeat of the freeways in the early 70’s.

The automobile will join transit, walking and cycling as alternate transportation. A choice for some, a necessity for a few, but no longer dominant.

With streets still jammed with traffic, this may seem unlikely. However, the 2006 Census reported the total being a mere 51.5% of people drive to work. Chances are that high gas prices have already reduced that to under half. Still another 6% are passengers so a bit over half still commute by car so still over half get to work by car. Many of the steps of inevitability are already in motion. The high price of gas, the higher price of housing, climate change, the Central Valley Greenway, South East False Creek, wider sidewalks on Burrard Bridge. In the end, it will likely be the Canada Line that will make the final difference. The much maligned little mini metro that could can and will likely be the nudge that pushes the automobile over the cliff of eternal minority status.

As the auto follows the horse to pasture, we still will fondly reminisce the summer drive on the open road. On the weekend we may even take the country train to enjoy a cruise down memory lane. The new hobby horse.

Worshiped and loved. The heart and soul of the twentieth century. Or was it. In reflection, the age of the automobile will appear as the illusion it was. Never an option for the majority of the people in the world. Never the dominate form of transportation in the world.

A strange love at that. A love proclaimed but not with patience. In reality, a tool of convenience, the less time spent with the better, lest one explodes with rage with the least of unintended provocation. We deserve better love than that.

Never before in history has a creation burned so bright, rose so high so fast, burned out so fast and fell to the ground so hard. It soared but never flew. So much for hydrogen and hybrids, the hyped, hapless, hopeless harbingers of non-change. Automotive margarine. In the end, it simply just ran out of gas. It lasted only a hundred years. A mere blip in human history. Will it even be remembered in the passage of time, our age of strip malls, cul-du-sacs and drive-ins.

Vancouver is ahead but Burnaby and New West are not far behind. Vancouver will be the first city in Canada and on the west coast to relegate the automobile to minority status. We follow in the footsteps of New York City and Washington DC. One by one, the rest will fall, the bastions of Buick, Benz and BMW under the boots of the relentless march of inevitability. The driving beat marking the end of the age of the automobile.

Only A Year and a Half in the Making

2008-08-26T18:01:00.000-07:00

Welcome everyone. Finally, I've got this site up. Seems like it took me forever . I've been sitting on the domain for over a year. This site had the gestation period almost as long as an elephant. So much for sense of urgency.

Internal debates on using blogger or wordpress or something else. Wanting to get every pixel right. I guess I have a perfectionist streak. Blah, blah, blah. Lame excuses. I'll be more focused from now on. That said, I suspect my new found energy for this site is in reality a lamer distraction from the Bike Sharing business plan I should be writing or perhaps, more precisely ,unwriting, as it is approaching a portly 80 pages.

Unfortunately, a lack of urgency seems to be a popular disease. Procrastination loves company, I guess. If we used a fraction of the creativity we use to think of excuses why things can't be done to instead create solutions, we would be well on our way to solving the big problems we have.

Climate change, for instance. The "We don't do anything until China and India agree to reduce emissions." talking point is especially annoying. It is just an excuse to delay or avoid action. Leadership is required now. Sure, everyone must reduce emissions but expecting people that are using a fraction of the fossil fuels we are using to agree to limit their emissions before we show any commitment to reduce ours is ridiculous.

Instead of "Drill Now", how about "Stop Driving Now" for a campaign slogan. Now that would show real guts for a politician.

Reduce gas prices, energy independence, few greenhouse gas emissions, less congestion, fewer deaths. Sounds like a winning solution now.